Quadro K600 vs Radeon Pro 460

In this comparison between Quadro K600 and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K600 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K600 Check Price

Radeon Pro 460 Check Price

Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:

Radeon Pro 460 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K600	Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)	41 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K600 has 17% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Quadro K600 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro K600.
Quadro K600 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro K600 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 24 MHz higher, than Quadro K600.
Quadro K600 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3218 MHz higher, than Quadro K600.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K600.
low / 768p	60−65	220−230
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	35−40
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than Quadro K600.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro K600 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K600.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	40−45
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro K600.

Full Specs

	Quadro K600	Radeon Pro 460
Architecture	Kepler	Polaris
Code name	GK107	Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 March 2013	8 August 2016
Pipelines	192	1024
Core clock speed	876 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		907 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	14.02	58.05
Floating-point performance	336.4 gflops	1,858 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	81.28 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	11 Mh/s	227 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K600 vs Radeon Pro 460

Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares