Quadro K600 vs Radeon R7 A265

In this comparison between Quadro K600 and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K600 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  Quadro K600 Radeon R7 A265
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs
  Check Price
  • Quadro K600 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
  • Radeon R7 A265 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro K600.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Quadro K600 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro K600 is 151 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
  • Quadro K600 and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 18 MHz higher, than Quadro K600.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 0−1 1−2
ultra / 1080p 0−1
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 1−2 12−14
medium / 1080p 0−1 3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro K600.

Full Specs

  Quadro K600 Radeon R7 A265
Architecture Kepler GCN 1.0
Code name GK107 Opal
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 1 March 2013 9 January 2014
Pipelines 192 384
Core clock speed 876 MHz 725 MHz
Boost Clock 825 MHz
Transistor count 1,270 million 950 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 14.02 19.80
Floating-point performance 336.4 gflops 633.6 gflops
Length 160 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB/s 28.8 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_1)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
CUDA 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 11 Mh/s
  Check Price