Quadro K600 vs Radeon RX Vega 9

In this comparison between Quadro K600 and Radeon RX Vega 9 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K600 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 9 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon RX Vega 9 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon RX Vega 9 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 9 here:

Main Specs

  Quadro K600 Radeon RX Vega 9
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro K600 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - in Laptops.
  • Quadro K600 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - with Vega.
  • Quadro K600 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 0−1 12−14
ultra / 1080p 8−9
QHD / 1440p 0−1 2−3
low / 720p 1−2 27−30
medium / 1080p 0−1 16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 9 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Quadro K600.

Full Specs

  Quadro K600 Radeon RX Vega 9
Architecture Kepler Vega
Code name GK107 Vega Raven Ridge
Type Workstation Laptop
Release date 1 March 2013 26 October 2017
Pipelines 192 576
Core clock speed 876 MHz
Boost Clock 1300 MHz
Transistor count 1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 14.02
Floating-point performance 336.4 gflops
Length 160 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0) DirectX 12_1
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 11 Mh/s
  Check Price Check Price