Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro M4000 vs Quadro K620

    When comparing FirePro M4000 and Quadro K620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4000 and Quadro K620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    FirePro M4000 Check Price
    Quadro K620 Check Price

    FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:

    FirePro M4000 Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro M4000 Quadro K620
    Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 41 Watt
    Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 128 Bit
    Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K620 has 24% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
    • FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro K620 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro K620 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
    • FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K620 - in Desktops.
    • FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 458 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
    • FirePro M4000 and Quadro K620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2700 MHz higher, than Quadro K620.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 7−8 10−12
    ultra / 1080p 4−5 6−7
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 1−2
    low / 720p 18−20 24−27
    medium / 1080p 9−10 14−16
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than FirePro M4000.

    Full Specs

      FirePro M4000 Quadro K620
    Architecture GCN Maxwell
    Code name Cape Verde GLM GM107
    Type Mobile workstation Workstation
    Release date 1 July 2012 22 July 2014
    Pipelines 512 384
    Core clock speed 600 MHz 1058 MHz
    Boost Clock 1124 MHz
    Transistor count 1,500 million 1,870 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 21.60 26.98
    Floating-point performance 691.2 gflops 863.2 gflops
    Length 160 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 1800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12
    Shader Model 5.1 5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 +
    CUDA 5.0
    Bus support n/a
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 79 Mh/s 104 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Form factor MXM-A
    StereoOutput3D +
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    Width 1" (2.5 cm)
    Number of simultaneous displays 4
    nView Desktop Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares