FirePro M4150 vs Quadro K620
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Quadro K620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro K620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
Main Specs
FirePro M4150
Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)
41 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K620 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K620 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 343 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
FirePro M4150 and Quadro K620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K620.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
6−7
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Battlefield 5 is 188% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p
120−130
180−190
medium / 768p
90−95
150−160
ultra / 1080p
35−40
75−80
QHD / 1440p
21−24
45−50
4K / 2160p
16−18
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
80−85
ultra / 1080p
20−22
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Dota 2 is 60% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
2−3
12−14
4K / 2160p
2−3
5−6
low / 720p
10−12
30−33
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
10−11
20−22
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
−
low / 720p
50−55
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−12
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Fortnite is 110% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
5−6
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
−
60−65
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
1−2
7−8
ultra / 1080p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
4−5
21−24
medium / 1080p
3−4
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
95−100
medium / 1080p
85−90
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
−
20−22
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
9−10
40−45
medium / 768p
8−9
24−27
high / 1080p
4−5
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
70−75
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
high / 768p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FirePro M4150.
Full Specs
FirePro M4150
Quadro K620
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Code name
Opal
GM107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
16 October 2013
22 July 2014
Pipelines
384
384
Core clock speed
715 MHz
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.16
26.98
Floating-point performance
549.1 gflops
863.2 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
+
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
104 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
