FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K620

In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and Quadro K620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V4900 Check Price

Quadro K620 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	41 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 has 82% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K620 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 258 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K620 - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V4900 is 3 mm longer, than Quadro K620.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K620.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	10−12
ultra / 1080p	1−2	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	24−27
medium / 1080p	4−5	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	5−6	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	16−18	40−45
medium / 1080p	6−7	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	110−120	180−190
medium / 768p	90−95	150−160
ultra / 1080p	40−45	75−80
QHD / 1440p	24−27	45−50
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	75−80	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	70−75	95−100
medium / 768p	50−55	80−85
ultra / 1080p	24−27	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Dota 2 is 54% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	3−4	12−14
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
4K / 2160p	1−2	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	30−33
medium / 1080p	4−5	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	10−12	20−22
ultra / 1080p	6−7	14−16
QHD / 1440p	4−5	−
low / 720p	50−55	80−85
medium / 1080p	12−14	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Fortnite is 100% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	7−8	20−22
ultra / 1080p	6−7	16−18
QHD / 1440p	1−2	5−6
low / 720p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	3−4	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	2−3	7−8
ultra / 1080p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	5−6	21−24
medium / 1080p	3−4	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	−	95−100
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	24−27	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 70% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	6−7	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	12−14	40−45
medium / 768p	10−11	24−27
high / 1080p	5−6	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	35−40	55−60
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
high / 768p	30−33	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro V4900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro K620
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell
Code name	Turks	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 November 2011	22 July 2014
Pipelines	480	384
Core clock speed	800 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	26.98
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length	163 mm	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA		5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	73 Mh/s	104 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K620

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares