FirePro W8000 vs Quadro K620

When comparing FirePro W8000 and Quadro K620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W8000 and Quadro K620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro W8000 Check Price

Quadro K620 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W8000	Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	41 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W8000 has 448% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
FirePro W8000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W8000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W8000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 158 MHz higher, than FirePro W8000.
FirePro W8000 and Quadro K620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro W8000 is 119 mm longer, than Quadro K620.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 3700 MHz higher, than Quadro K620.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	10−12
ultra / 1080p	10−11	6−7
QHD / 1440p	4−5	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	24−27
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 63% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	27−30	18−20
ultra / 1080p	24−27	16−18
QHD / 1440p	7−8	2−3
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	60−65	40−45
medium / 1080p	30−35	20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	50−55	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	220−230	180−190
medium / 768p	190−200	150−160
ultra / 1080p	100−110	75−80
QHD / 1440p	65−70	45−50
4K / 2160p	35−40	30−33
high / 768p	150−160	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	45−50	30−35
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	110−120	95−100
medium / 768p	100−110	80−85
ultra / 1080p	70−75	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	21−24	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	5−6
low / 720p	45−50	30−33
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	27−30	20−22
ultra / 1080p	21−24	14−16
QHD / 1440p	14−16	−
low / 720p	110−120	80−85
medium / 1080p	60−65	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	30−33	20−22
ultra / 1080p	21−24	16−18
QHD / 1440p	10−12	5−6
low / 720p	60−65	40−45
medium / 1080p	30−35	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 52% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	95−100	70−75
medium / 768p	85−90	60−65
high / 1080p	35−40	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	9−10
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	10−12	7−8
ultra / 1080p	8−9	5−6
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	14−16	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	−	95−100
medium / 1080p	110−120	100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	65−70	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	21−24
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	65−70	40−45
medium / 768p	40−45	24−27
high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	12−14	9−10
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
medium / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	27−30
high / 768p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro K620.

Full Specs

	FirePro W8000	Quadro K620
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Tahiti	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	14 June 2012	22 July 2014
Pipelines	1792	384
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	26.98
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length	279 mm	160 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	176 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA		5.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	391 Mh/s	104 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W8000 vs Quadro K620

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares