FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K620

When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K620, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K620.

FireStream 9270

Quadro K620 Check Price

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	41 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FireStream 9270 has 290% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FireStream 9270 and Quadro K620 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 308 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K620 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K620.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	10−12
ultra / 1080p	2−3	6−7
QHD / 1440p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	24−27
medium / 1080p	7−8	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	18−20
ultra / 1080p	8−9	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−12	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9270 and Quadro K620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	180−190
medium / 768p	100−110	150−160
ultra / 1080p	50−55	75−80
QHD / 1440p	27−30	45−50
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	95−100
medium / 768p	55−60	80−85
ultra / 1080p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	12−14
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	30−33
medium / 1080p	8−9	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Far Cry 5 is 87% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	20−22
ultra / 1080p	0−1	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	55−60	80−85
medium / 1080p	18−20	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Fortnite is 71% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 86% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	70−75
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	10−12	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	7−8
ultra / 1080p	1−2	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	21−24
medium / 1080p	5−6	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	80−85	95−100
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	20−22
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	45−50
medium / 1080p	10−11	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 125% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	21−24
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	40−45
medium / 768p	14−16	24−27
high / 1080p	6−7	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
medium / 768p	40−45	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
high / 768p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro K620
Architecture	TeraScale	Maxwell
Code name	RV770	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	22 July 2014
Pipelines	800	384
Core clock speed	750 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00	26.98
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length		160 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12
Shader Model	4.1	5
OpenGL	3.3	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA		5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		104 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K620

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares