GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro K620

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 275 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 275 Check Price

Quadro K620 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 275	Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	41 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 275 has 434% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 275 has 894 GB more memory, than Quadro K620.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 346 MHz higher, than Quadro K620.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K620 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K620 is 150 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 275.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K620 is 666 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	10−12
ultra / 1080p	4−5	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	16−18	24−27
medium / 1080p	8−9	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	10−12	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	180−190
medium / 768p	100−110	150−160
ultra / 1080p	50−55	75−80
QHD / 1440p	27−30	45−50
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
medium / 768p	55−60	80−85
ultra / 1080p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	8−9	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
4K / 2160p	3−4	5−6
low / 720p	18−20	30−33
medium / 1080p	8−9	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	10−11	14−16
low / 720p	60−65	80−85
medium / 1080p	21−24	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Fortnite is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	12−14	20−22
ultra / 1080p	10−12	16−18
QHD / 1440p	1−2	5−6
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	50−55	70−75
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	4−5	7−8
ultra / 1080p	3−4	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	21−24
medium / 1080p	6−7	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Metro Exodus is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	95−100
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	16−18	20−22
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	30−35	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	10−12	21−24
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	24−27	40−45
medium / 768p	16−18	24−27
high / 1080p	9−10	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	40−45	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
high / 768p	35−40	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 275.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 275	Quadro K620
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	GT200B	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	15 January 2009	22 July 2014
Pipelines	240	384
Core clock speed	1404 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	50.6 billion/sec	26.98
Floating-point performance	673.9 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	160 mm
Memory bus width	448 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1134 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	127.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12
Shader Model	4.0	5
OpenGL	3.0	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA	+	5.0
CUDA cores	240
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		104 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro K620

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares