GRID K160Q vs Quadro K620

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K160Q and Quadro K620, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K160Q stacks up against Quadro K620, check out specs charts below.

GRID K160Q

Quadro K620 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	41 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 217% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K620 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 208 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
GRID K160Q and Quadro K620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K620 is 18 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	9−10	24−27
medium / 1080p	1−2	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	1−2	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	8−9	40−45
medium / 1080p	2−3	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Battlefield 5 is 550% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	100−110	180−190
medium / 768p	75−80	150−160
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
QHD / 1440p	−	45−50
4K / 2160p	9−10	30−33
high / 768p	50−55	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	95−100
medium / 768p	35−40	80−85
ultra / 1080p	14−16	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Dota 2 is 92% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	6−7	30−33
medium / 1080p	1−2	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	40−45	80−85
medium / 1080p	3−4	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Fortnite is 169% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	3−4	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	70−75
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
high / 1080p	50−55	−
ultra / 1080p	−	95−100
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2100% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	40−45
medium / 768p	−	24−27
high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 833% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	95−100
medium / 768p	30−35	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−11	27−30
high / 768p	27−30	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro K620
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK107	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	22 July 2014
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	26.98
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length		160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		104 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Quadro K620

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares