Quadro 2000M vs Quadro K620
In this comparison between Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M
Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
41 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000M has 34% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro K620 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K620 - in Desktops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 508 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K620 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K620 is 900 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
1−2
24−27
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
20−22
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p
60−65
180−190
medium / 768p
27−30
150−160
ultra / 1080p
7−8
75−80
QHD / 1440p
−
45−50
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
16−18
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 375% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
10−11
80−85
ultra / 1080p
0−1
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Dota 2 is 210% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
30−33
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
high / 1080p
−
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
80−85
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Fortnite is 272% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
0−1
21−24
low / 768p
18−20
70−75
medium / 768p
−
60−65
high / 1080p
0−1
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
−
95−100
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 720p
8−9
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
0−1
40−45
medium / 768p
−
24−27
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
high / 768p
12−14
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in World of Tanks is 168% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M
Quadro K620
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
Fermi
GM107
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
22 February 2011
22 July 2014
Pipelines
192
384
Core clock speed
550 MHz
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
26.98
Floating-point performance
422.4 gflops
863.2 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
+
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
104 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price