Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K620

When choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K620, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K620.

Quadro FX 3800

Quadro K620 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	41 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 has 163% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K620 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 458 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K620 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro FX 3800 is 38 mm longer, than Quadro K620.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K620 is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	24−27
medium / 1080p	1−2	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	9−10	40−45
medium / 1080p	2−3	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Battlefield 5 is 550% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	100−110	180−190
medium / 768p	75−80	150−160
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
QHD / 1440p	−	45−50
4K / 2160p	9−10	30−33
high / 768p	50−55	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	95−100
medium / 768p	40−45	80−85
ultra / 1080p	14−16	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	7−8	30−33
medium / 1080p	2−3	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Far Cry 5 is 533% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	40−45	80−85
medium / 1080p	4−5	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Fortnite is 169% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	35−40	70−75
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	1−2	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Metro Exodus is 2100% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
high / 1080p	50−55	−
ultra / 1080p	−	95−100
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	2−3	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	4−5	40−45
medium / 768p	−	24−27
high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 833% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	95−100
medium / 768p	30−35	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	27−30
high / 768p	27−30	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

Full Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Quadro K620
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	GT200B	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 March 2009	22 July 2014
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	38.40	26.98
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length	198 mm	160 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12
Shader Model	4.0	5
OpenGL	3.3	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA	1.3	5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		104 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K620

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares