Quadro K620 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

In this comparison between Quadro K620 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K620 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:

Main Specs

  Quadro K620 Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 35 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None None
Memory type 128 Bit GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro K620 has 17% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
  • Quadro K620 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
  • Quadro K620 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Quadro K620 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
  • Quadro K620 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
  • Quadro K620 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro K620.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 10−12 7−8
ultra / 1080p 6−7 4−5
QHD / 1440p 1−2 0−1
low / 720p 24−27 18−20
medium / 1080p 14−16 9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.

Full Specs

  Quadro K620 Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture Maxwell Polaris
Code name GM107 Polaris 12
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Release date 22 July 2014 21 March 2018
Pipelines 384 512
Core clock speed 1058 MHz
Boost Clock 1124 MHz 1219 MHz
Transistor count 1,870 million 2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 26.98 39.01
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 1,248 gflops
Length 160 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 48 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 12 (12_0)
Shader Model 5 6.4
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan + 1.2.131
CUDA 5.0
FreeSync +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 104 Mh/s
Laptop size large
3D Vision Pro +
Mosaic +
Width 1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays 4
nView Desktop Management +
  Check Price Check Price