FirePro M4150 vs Quadro K620M
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro K620M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and Quadro K620M.
FirePro M4150
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K620M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 314 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Fortnite is 18% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FirePro M4150 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FirePro M4150 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Opal | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |