FirePro R5000 vs Quadro K620M
In this comparison between FirePro R5000 and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro R5000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
FirePro R5000
Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro R5000 has 1066% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
FirePro R5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro R5000 and Quadro K620M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro R5000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro R5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 204 MHz higher, than FirePro R5000.
FirePro R5000 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro R5000 is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
3−4
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
21−24
7−8
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
45−50
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro R5000 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
190−200
120−130
medium / 768p
160−170
95−100
ultra / 1080p
90−95
45−50
QHD / 1440p
50−55
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
130−140
70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
85−90
55−60
ultra / 1080p
55−60
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
14−16
3−4
4K / 2160p
5−6
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
21−24
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
90−95
55−60
medium / 1080p
45−50
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Fortnite is 105% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
21−24
6−7
ultra / 1080p
18−20
6−7
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
21−24
medium / 1080p
24−27
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
24−27
8−9
ultra / 1080p
10−12
3−4
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
8−9
2−3
ultra / 1080p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
7−8
medium / 1080p
10−12
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
−
65−70
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
7−8
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
16−18
medium / 768p
30−33
12−14
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
95−100
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
16−18
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
FirePro R5000
Quadro K620M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Code name
Pitcairn
GM108
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
25 February 2013
1 March 2015
Pipelines
768
384
Core clock speed
825 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
39.60
17.98
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
863.2 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
Dual-link DVI support
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price