FirePro V7900 vs Quadro K620M
In this comparison between FirePro V7900 and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V7900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V7900
Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)
151 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V7900 has 403% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro V7900 and Quadro K620M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V7900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 304 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
3−4
ultra / 1080p
6−7
1−2
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
18−20
7−8
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
20−22
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Battlefield 5 is 130% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V7900 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
120−130
medium / 768p
150−160
95−100
ultra / 1080p
75−80
45−50
QHD / 1440p
45−50
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
110−120
70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
30−33
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
FirePro V7900 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
medium / 768p
80−85
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Dota 2 is 42% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
4K / 2160p
5−6
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Far Cry 5 is 157% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
20−22
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
80−85
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Fortnite is 69% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
18−20
6−7
ultra / 1080p
14−16
6−7
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
70−75
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
−
high / 1080p
21−24
8−9
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
7−8
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
7−8
medium / 1080p
9−10
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Metro Exodus is 225% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
−
65−70
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
100−105
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
45−50
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
7−8
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
40−45
16−18
medium / 768p
24−27
12−14
high / 1080p
14−16
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 137% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
95−100
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
16−18
high / 768p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
FirePro V7900
Quadro K620M
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Maxwell
Code name
Cayman
GM108
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
1 March 2015
Pipelines
1280
384
Core clock speed
725 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
58.00
17.98
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
863.2 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.0
5
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
171 Mh/s
92 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price