FirePro W4100 vs Quadro K620M

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W4100 and Quadro K620M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W4100 stacks up against Quadro K620M, check out specs charts below.

FirePro W4100 Check Price

Quadro K620M Check Price

Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:

Quadro K620M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4100	Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4100 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
FirePro W4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4100 and Quadro K620M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W4100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 399 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4100 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	3−4
ultra / 1080p	4−5	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	14−16
medium / 1080p	8−9	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	12−14	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−11	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	18−20
medium / 1080p	12−14	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	130−140	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	95−100
ultra / 1080p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	30−33	24−27
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
high / 768p	80−85	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	18−20	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	80−85	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	8−9	4−5
ultra / 1080p	8−9	3−4
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	14−16
medium / 1080p	9−10	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
low / 720p	60−65	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Fortnite is 17% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	12−14	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−12	6−7
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	21−24
medium / 1080p	14−16	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
medium / 768p	45−50	−
high / 1080p	12−14	8−9
ultra / 1080p	6−7	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	5−6	2−3
ultra / 1080p	3−4	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	7−8
medium / 1080p	6−7	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
high / 1080p	90−95	65−70
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	7−8	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	7−8
medium / 1080p	10−12	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	24−27	16−18
medium / 768p	16−18	12−14
high / 1080p	9−10	6−7
ultra / 1080p	6−7	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	85−90	70−75
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
ultra / 1080p	20−22	16−18
high / 768p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro K620M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4100	Quadro K620M
Architecture	GCN	Maxwell
Code name	Cape Verde	GM108
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 October 2015	1 March 2015
Pipelines	512	384
Core clock speed	630 MHz	1029 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	20.16	17.98
Floating-point performance	645.1 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length	171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	79 Mh/s	92 Mh/s
Optimus		+
Form factor	low profile / half length
Dual-link DVI support	+
Display Port		1.2
nView Display Management		+
AppAcceleration	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4100 vs Quadro K620M

Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares