FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K620M

When choosing between FirePro W4300 and Quadro K620M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4300 and Quadro K620M.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

Quadro K620M Check Price

Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:

Quadro K620M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 99 MHz higher, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 4000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	8−9	1−2
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	24−27	7−8
ultra / 1080p	20−22	5−6
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	24−27	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	120−130
medium / 768p	170−180	95−100
ultra / 1080p	95−100	45−50
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	140−150	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	60−65	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	16−18	4−5
ultra / 1080p	16−18	3−4
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	95−100	55−60
medium / 1080p	50−55	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	24−27	6−7
ultra / 1080p	20−22	6−7
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	27−30	8−9
ultra / 1080p	12−14	3−4
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	7−8
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	65−70
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	14−16	6−7
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	7−8
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	50−55	16−18
medium / 768p	30−35	12−14
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−12	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Quadro K620M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	Quadro K620M
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	Bonaire	GM108
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 December 2015	1 March 2015
Pipelines	768	384
Core clock speed	930 MHz	1029 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	17.98
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length	171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12
Shader Model	6.3	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s	92 Mh/s
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K620M

Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares