FirePro W5100 vs Quadro K620M
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and Quadro K620M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and Quadro K620M.
FirePro W5100
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 99 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W5100 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 225% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Bonaire | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 92 Mh/s |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |