FirePro W7000 vs Quadro K620M
In this comparison between FirePro W7000 and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7000
Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W7000 has 1066% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
FirePro W7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
FirePro W7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 79 MHz higher, than FirePro W7000.
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 2800 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
3−4
ultra / 1080p
12−14
1−2
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
24−27
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
30−35
7−8
ultra / 1080p
27−30
5−6
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
18−20
medium / 1080p
35−40
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Battlefield 5 is 310% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
230−240
120−130
medium / 768p
200−210
95−100
ultra / 1080p
120−130
45−50
QHD / 1440p
90−95
24−27
4K / 2160p
50−55
−
high / 768p
170−180
70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
50−55
20−22
medium / 1080p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
120−130
75−80
medium / 768p
100−110
55−60
ultra / 1080p
80−85
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Dota 2 is 92% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
24−27
4−5
ultra / 1080p
21−24
3−4
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
14−16
medium / 1080p
27−30
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Far Cry 5 is 357% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
24−27
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
120−130
55−60
medium / 1080p
70−75
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Fortnite is 184% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
35−40
6−7
ultra / 1080p
27−30
6−7
QHD / 1440p
14−16
0−1
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
70−75
21−24
medium / 1080p
40−45
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
95−100
−
high / 1080p
40−45
8−9
ultra / 1080p
16−18
3−4
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
12−14
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−11
0−1
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
7−8
medium / 1080p
18−20
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
high / 1080p
−
65−70
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro K620M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
70−75
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
7−8
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
75−80
16−18
medium / 768p
45−50
12−14
high / 1080p
24−27
6−7
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 325% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
40−45
16−18
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
FirePro W7000
Quadro K620M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Code name
Pitcairn
GM108
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
13 June 2012
1 March 2015
Pipelines
1280
384
Core clock speed
950 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
76.00
17.98
Floating-point performance
2,432 gflops
863.2 gflops
Length
242 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4800 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
285 Mh/s
92 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
6 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price