Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro W7170M vs Quadro K620M

    When comparing FirePro W7170M and Quadro K620M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7170M and Quadro K620M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    FirePro W7170M Check Price
    Quadro K620M Check Price

    FirePro W7170M and Quadro K620M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: FirePro W7170M and Quadro K620M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M or Quadro K620M here:

    FirePro W7170M Laptops
    Quadro K620M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro W7170M Quadro K620M
    Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 30 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro W7170M has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
    • FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • FirePro W7170M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 306 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
    • FirePro W7170M and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 20−22 3−4
    ultra / 1080p 12−14 1−2
    QHD / 1440p 6−7 0−1
    4K / 2160p 5−6 −
    low / 720p 35−40 14−16
    medium / 1080p 24−27 5−6
    The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Quadro K620M.

    Full Specs

      FirePro W7170M Quadro K620M
    Architecture GCN 3 Maxwell
    Code name Tonga GM108
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 2 October 2015 1 March 2015
    Pipelines 2048 384
    Core clock speed 723 MHz 1029 MHz
    Boost Clock 1124 MHz
    Transistor count 5,000 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 92.54 17.98
    Floating-point performance 2,961 gflops 863.2 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 2000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB/s 14.4 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (12_0) 12
    Shader Model 6.3 5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    OpenCL 2.0 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
    CUDA +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 92 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Eyefinity +
    Display Port 1.2
    nView Display Management +
    AppAcceleration +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares