FirePro W8100 vs Quadro K620M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W8100 and Quadro K620M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W8100 stacks up against Quadro K620M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W8100
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 633% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 205 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 590% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 685% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 357% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Hawaii | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 92 Mh/s |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |