FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K620M
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K620M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K620M.
FireStream 9270
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 433% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Quadro K620M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 279 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1600 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | GM108 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |