GeForce 820A vs Quadro K620M
When comparing GeForce 820A and Quadro K620M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 820A and Quadro K620M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 820A
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | Quadro K620M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K620M has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K620M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 254 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K620M is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | Quadro K620M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GF117 | GM108 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |