GeForce 920A vs Quadro K620M
In this comparison between GeForce 920A and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro K620M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 920A has 10% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro K620M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 75 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 2 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro K620M | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GK208B | GM108 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 1 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.5 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |