GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Quadro K620M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 768MB will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 354 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K620M is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Dota 2 is 48% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Far Cry 5 is 157% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Fortnite is 82% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Forza Horizon 4 is 136% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Grand Theft Auto V is 84% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Metro Exodus is 225% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in World of Tanks is 48% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM108 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | no data | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |