GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro K620M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 83% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K620M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 401 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2008 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Minecraft is 3% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK106 | GM108 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |