GRID K520 vs Quadro K620M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K520 and Quadro K620M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro K620M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K520
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 284 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K520 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 257% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK104 | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 92 Mh/s |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |