GRID M6 8Q vs Quadro K620M
When comparing GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K620M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K620M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M6 8Q
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 307 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 3012 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 112% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 83% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 314% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 157% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 254% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM204 | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |