GRID M60 1Q vs Quadro K620M
When comparing GRID M60 1Q and Quadro K620M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 1Q and Quadro K620M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 1Q
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- GRID M60 1Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K620M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 472 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 3012 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 340% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 98% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 210% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 525% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 362% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM204 | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |