Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro K620M
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K620M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K620M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K620M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K620M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 or Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K620M has 100% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 729 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
3−4
ultra / 1080p
5−6
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−11
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
14−16
7−8
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
150−160
120−130
medium / 768p
120−130
95−100
ultra / 1080p
60−65
45−50
QHD / 1440p
35−40
24−27
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
90−95
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
medium / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
10−11
4−5
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
4K / 2160p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−11
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
65−70
55−60
medium / 1080p
27−30
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 34% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
14−16
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
6−7
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
16−18
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
−
high / 1080p
16−18
8−9
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
5−6
2−3
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
7−8
medium / 1080p
7−8
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
high / 1080p
90−95
65−70
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
7−8
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
30−35
16−18
medium / 768p
20−22
12−14
high / 1080p
10−12
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro K620M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Maxwell
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GM108
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
1 March 2015
Pipelines
48
384
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1124 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
17.98
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
863.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price