Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro K620M
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K620M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K620M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K620M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K620M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
eDRAM
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 829 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
3−4
ultra / 1080p
5−6
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
14−16
7−8
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
120−130
medium / 768p
130−140
95−100
ultra / 1080p
65−70
45−50
QHD / 1440p
35−40
24−27
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
100−110
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
10−12
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
4K / 2160p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
70−75
55−60
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
14−16
6−7
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 81% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
−
high / 1080p
18−20
8−9
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
6−7
2−3
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
7−8
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
95−100
65−70
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 31% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
7−8
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
30−35
16−18
medium / 768p
21−24
12−14
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
16−18
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro K620M
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Maxwell
Code name
Haswell GT3e
GM108
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
1 March 2015
Pipelines
40
384
Core clock speed
200 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1124 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
17.98
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
863.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price