Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro K620M
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K620M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K620M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K620M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K620M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K620M has 100% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 729 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
3−4
ultra / 1080p
3−4
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
8−9
8−9
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
95−100
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
6−7
5−6
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Fortnite is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
40−45
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
8−9
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
7−8
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
80−85
65−70
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
16−18
16−18
medium / 768p
12−14
12−14
high / 1080p
7−8
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
80−85
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro K620M
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Maxwell
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
GM108
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
1 March 2015
Pipelines
48
384
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1124 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
17.98
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
863.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price