Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K620M vs Quadro M3000M

    In this comparison between Quadro K620M and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K620M will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Quadro K620M Check Price
    Quadro M3000M Check Price

    Quadro K620M and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Quadro K620M and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M or Quadro M3000M here:

    Quadro K620M Laptops
    Quadro M3000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K620M Quadro M3000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro M3000M has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
    • Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • Quadro K620M and Quadro M3000M are build with Maxwell architecture.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 21 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
    • Quadro K620M and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 3−4 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 1−2 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 14−16 60−65
    medium / 1080p 5−6 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Quadro K620M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K620M Quadro M3000M
    Architecture Maxwell Maxwell
    Code name GM108 GM204
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 March 2015 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 384 1,024
    Core clock speed 1029 MHz 1050 MHz
    Boost Clock 1124 MHz
    Transistor count 5,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 17.98 67.20
    Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 2,150 gflops
    Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 5000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB/s 160 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 12
    Shader Model 5 5.0
    OpenGL 4.5 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.1.126
    CUDA + 5.2
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 92 Mh/s 253 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus + +
    Display Port 1.2 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management + +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares