Quadro K620M vs Quadro T1000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K620M and Quadro T1000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K620M stacks up against Quadro T1000, check out specs charts below.
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K620M | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K620M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 366 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro K620M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 685% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 357% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro K620M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K620M | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
Code name | GM108 | TU117 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 March 2015 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |