Quadro K620M vs Radeon Pro 555
In this comparison between Quadro K620M and Radeon Pro 555 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K620M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K620M and Radeon Pro 555 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K620M and Radeon Pro 555 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M or Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K620M
Radeon Pro 555
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 555 has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro K620M and Radeon Pro 555 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 174 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555.
Quadro K620M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 3080 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro K620M and Radeon Pro 555 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
180−190
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
70−75
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
40−45
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
95−100
ultra / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
4−5
18−20
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Far Cry 5 is 257% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
16−18
55−60
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
20−22
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 237% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
Quadro K620M
Radeon Pro 555
Architecture
Maxwell
Polaris
Code name
GM108
Polaris 21
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 March 2015
5 June 2017
Pipelines
384
768
Core clock speed
1029 MHz
855 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
17.98
40.80
Floating-point performance
863.2 gflops
1,306 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
81.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
