Quadro K620M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
In this comparison between Quadro K620M and Radeon Pro W5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K620M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro W5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K620M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 183% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro K620M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Quadro K620M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 10000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K620M and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 115% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K620M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Navi 14 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 March 2015 | 10 February 2020 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1408 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 6,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 127.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |