Quadro K620M vs Radeon R7 260X

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K620M and Radeon R7 260X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K620M stacks up against Radeon R7 260X, check out specs charts below.

Quadro K620M Check Price

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:

Quadro K620M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K620M	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260X has 283% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
Quadro K620M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260X - in Desktops.
Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro K620M and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	3−4	16−18
ultra / 1080p	1−2	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	5−6	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K620M and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	210−220
medium / 768p	95−100	180−190
ultra / 1080p	45−50	100−110
QHD / 1440p	24−27	55−60
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
high / 768p	70−75	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	40−45
medium / 1080p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	95−100
ultra / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	4−5	18−20
ultra / 1080p	3−4	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	14−16	40−45
medium / 1080p	5−6	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	20−22
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	6−7	27−30
ultra / 1080p	6−7	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	9−10	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	8−9	30−35
ultra / 1080p	3−4	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	2−3	10−11
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	7−8	30−35
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	65−70	−
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	6−7	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	7−8	30−33
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	16−18	55−60
medium / 768p	12−14	35−40
high / 1080p	6−7	20−22
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 237% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Quadro K620M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K620M	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 2.0
Code name	GM108	Bonaire
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 March 2015	8 October 2013
Pipelines	384	896
Core clock speed	1029 MHz
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1000 MHz
Transistor count		2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.98	61.60
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length		170 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	104 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12
Shader Model	5	6.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	+
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s	225 Mh/s
Optimus	+
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
Display Port	1.2
nView Display Management	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K620M vs Radeon R7 260X

Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares