Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K620M vs Radeon R7 360

    In this comparison between Quadro K620M and Radeon R7 360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K620M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Quadro K620M Check Price
    Radeon R7 360 Check Price

    Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:

    Quadro K620M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K620M Radeon R7 360
    Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 100 Watt
    Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 6-pin
    Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Radeon R7 360 has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
    • Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro K620M and Radeon R7 360 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
    • Quadro K620M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 360 - in Desktops.
    • Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 360 - with GCN 2.0.
    • Quadro K620M and Radeon R7 360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 360 is 4000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 3−4 16−18
    ultra / 1080p 1−2 9−10
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 4−5
    4K / 2160p − 4−5
    low / 720p 14−16 30−35
    medium / 1080p 5−6 20−22
    The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro K620M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K620M Radeon R7 360
    Architecture Maxwell GCN 2.0
    Code name GM108 Tobago
    Type Mobile workstation Desktop
    Release date 1 March 2015 18 June 2015
    Pipelines 384 768
    Core clock speed 1029 MHz
    Boost Clock 1124 MHz 1000 MHz
    Transistor count 2,080 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 17.98 50.40
    Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 1,613 gflops
    Length 165 mm
    Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 6000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB/s 112 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12
    Shader Model 5 6.3
    OpenGL 4.5 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 2.0
    Vulkan 1.1.126 +
    CUDA +
    Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.2 kh/s
    FreeSync +
    Bus support PCIe 3.0
    HDMI +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 92 Mh/s 225 Mh/s
    Optimus +
    Eyefinity +
    PowerTune +
    TrueAudio +
    Mantle +
    Design reference
    Bridgeless CrossFire +
    Number of Eyefinity displays 6
    DisplayPort support +
    CrossFire +
    VCE +
    DDMA audio +
    Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.29 Gh/s
    Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 10 Mh/s
    Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 102 Sol/s
    Display Port 1.2
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares