Quadro K620M vs Radeon R9 M270X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K620M and Radeon R9 M270X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K620M and Radeon R9 M270X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M270X
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K620M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro K620M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 304 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Quadro K620M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K620M is 875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Far Cry 5 is 42% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 17% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K620M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 March 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |