Quadro K620M vs Radeon R9 M375X
When comparing Quadro K620M and Radeon R9 M375X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K620M and Radeon R9 M375X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M375X
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K620M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M375X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M375X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro K620M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 104 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
- Quadro K620M and Radeon R9 M375X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K620M is 875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K620M and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Fortnite is 47% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K620M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 March 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 40.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |