Quadro K620M vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K620M and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K620M stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K620M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 693% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro K620M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 455 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro K620M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 988 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 271% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K620M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | GM108 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 March 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |