Quadro K620M vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K620M and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K620M and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K620M
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 723% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
Quadro K620M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 455 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro K620M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1132 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 285% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 152% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 227% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
16−18
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
Quadro K620M
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GM108
GF110
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 March 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
384
448
Core clock speed
1029 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
17.98
32.14
Floating-point performance
863.2 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
