FirePro S10000 vs Quadro M1000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S10000 and Quadro M1000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S10000 stacks up against Quadro M1000M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S10000
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Quadro M1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 1775% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 168 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 and Quadro M1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 and Quadro M1000M is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 123% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 97% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Quadro M1000M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tahiti | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 31.78 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 140 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |