FirePro V5800 vs Quadro M1000M
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro M1000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and Quadro M1000M.
FirePro V5800
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 85% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M1000M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 303 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 137% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 69% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 96% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 85% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Juniper | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 31.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |