FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M1000M
When choosing between FirePro W8100 and Quadro M1000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W8100 and Quadro M1000M.
FirePro W8100
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Quadro M1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 450% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 169 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and Quadro M1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 and Quadro M1000M is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 139% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 123% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 97% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 92% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Quadro M1000M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Hawaii | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 31.78 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 140 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |