FireStream 9250 vs Quadro M1000M
When comparing FireStream 9250 and Quadro M1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro M1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9250
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 275% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M1000M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 368 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 3014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 255% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 78% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 158% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 225% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 48% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 31.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |