FireStream 9370 vs Quadro M1000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro M1000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against Quadro M1000M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 462% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 168 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cypress | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 31.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |