GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro M1000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro M1000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280 stacks up against Quadro M1000M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 490% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M1000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 303 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 3893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 31.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |