GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro M1000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro M1000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro M1000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB/4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 622% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 249 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 4001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 131% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 31.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |